Matt's Blog
Wednesday, April 15, 2026
Creepcast Review
This is my 50th podcast. It is currently ranked 39. The title of the episode is "Whitefall." It was released April 5. The hosts names are Hunter Hancock and Isaiah Priestly. They read and comment on horror stories. In this episode they read a book titled Whitefall, written by CK Walker. This episode is like listening to an audiobook with some pauses that add commentary. I thought the book was interesting. It did have some flaws in it thatIf you ever plan on reading Whitefall I recommend you read that first before reading this post. After that spoiler alert I will continue. Whitefall is about this guy riding on a bus. Many colorful characters are introduced. The story is told first person by the protaganist. He is obsessing over his girlfriend on the bus drive because he just found out she is pregnant. He was going to leave her for another city but after this news he is going to pay for her to come after her. The bus stops in a place called Whitefall. He is stranded there with other passangers at a big bus station due to a hurricane. They are there for weeks. They don't know where the workers are. Different buses break into tribes and there starts to be murders and cannibalism. They are there for weeks. The storytellers of this book kept interrupting to comment about how they broke into tribes too quickly to be realistic. Also, they interrupted to laugh about how one of the narrators was doing one of the characters voices to sound like Kermit the Frog. Many jokes were told. The bus came right after the protagonist finally succumbed to canniblism. Unlike the villains of the story, the protagonist didn't murder his food but ate a person who died naturally. After the trip, he found out he hadn't been gone weeks but it was only a day and that there was no place called Whitefall. But the guy who he was travelling with on the bus was really dead. The book doesn't explain what exactly happened. A funny scene was when one of the villains of the story who had been murdering and eating people had saved two uneaten candy bars that he started eating on the bus ride out. The hosts had some theories of different metaphors the book was telling. I liked the book overall and liked the hosts of the podcast and thought they had some funny commentary. I think I would rate the book a little lower than the podcast itself. Probably a 3/5 but still an enjoyable read. The book at some profanity and the hosts added their own so it gets the minus point for profanity. I give this podcast 4/5.
Tuesday, April 14, 2026
All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg Review
This is the 49th podcast. It is ranked number 39. The title of the episode is, "Anthropic's Generational Run, OpenAI Panics, AI Moats, Meta Loses Lawsuits." It was released March 27. This podcast they talked about a bunch of AI stuff and how they thought AI would shape the future. One of the hosts, David Sacks works for the Trump administration. Of course, Sacks will tow the company line as required by anyone in the Trump administration. He talked about the conflict between Trump and Anthropic and said criticizing Antrhopic, "if you as a company don't want your products to be used in war, don't sell to the Department of War. It's in the name. But if you do, if you do decide to sell to the Department of War, you should expect it to be used for all lawful uses." So many dumb things about this. First of all, it's not in the name because the Department of War doesn't exist, it's the Department of Defense by statute and the name can only be changed by statute. Secondly, Antrhopic didn't want their product to be used in domestic surveillance, which has nothing to do with war. The other dumb thing is the one sided criticism of Anthropic while having no criticism of Trump. It is the Trump administration that is illegally retaliating against a private company because the company opposed using its product for domestic surveillance. A normal reaction for the government if they didn't like the constraints a company put on their product would be to not do business with that company. But instead Team Trump attempts to put Anthropic out of business by blacklisting them and labeling them a "supply chain risk." Here they tell every business that does business with the Department of Defense that they can't do business with Anthropic.
Then Sacks goes on and does a classic MAGA move of accusing others of doing what they themselves are doing. He says Anthropic is cynically being anti-Trump because they are trying to recruit a bunch of PhDs who are left leaning. Meanwhile, Sacks is making a bucketload of money being pro-Trump. If you listen to Sacks, you wouldn't even understand the unlawful retaliation against Anthropic and you would have it dead wrong what Antrhopic was refusing for their product to do. Sacks cannot comprehend that in the world there are people who do things because they believe them. He cannot comprehend people not cynically lying about their positions for profit because that is who he is.
I have started using Claude more due to Anthropic standing up to Trump while OpenAI submits their will to Trump. I was pretty much just using ChatGPT and Google for AI, but now I have added Claude to the mix. I haven't abandoned the others. I have found Claude useful in helping me troubleshoot an issue we are having with our water at our house. But when I was planning some baseball practices, I put a little competition between AIs and used Claude, ChatGPT, Google, and Grok. I explained what I was looking for and asked it to come up with a baseball practice. I didn't go with everything on any of them but I did use mostly ChatGPT and have used it more for practices later. The reason I used ChatGPT more for practices was that it explained things more simply and it was easier to implement. Anywho, point being, I still use ChatGPT but I have opened the door to Claude on some things due to their stand. I had never used them before. If AI ever goes evil and tries to destroy humanity like in the Dune universe, I suspect it would be from OpenAI and Elon Musk's Grok. I think Anthropic is much more responsible.
That was kind of a sidetrack on the review but that's what I do. I give this podcast 0/5 for classic MAGA intellectual dishonesty. I think someone who relies on this podcast for reliable information would be better off not trying to listen to news related content and just focus their time on entertainment.
Tuesday, April 7, 2026
Crime, Conspiracy, Cults, and Murder Review
This is my 48th podcast. It is currently ranked number 43. The episode I listened to is titled, "The Plot Twist Murders That Shocked The Country. Banfield Ryan Murders." It was released April 1. The podcast is hosted by Kris Collins. This episode was about a guy named Brendon Banfield who murdered his wife and another man in Herndon, Virginia on February 24, 2023. She went over the crime scene, plotting the crime, and the investigation. Brendon had an affair with an au pair who was living with them from Brazil. He plotted with her to kill his wife. He decided to stage a home invasion. He impersonated his wife online and got a guy to come to their house. He made the guy think his wife had some weird sexual fantasy about being attacked in her sleep. He told him to bring a knife and zip ties. When the guy came over his au pair shot the guy and then Brendon stabbed his wife multiple times. He tried to stage the crime scene to make it look like the guy killed his wife and that he killed the guy. He transfered his wives blood from his wife to the guy's hands. Investigators could tell it was staged based on how the blood was on the guy's hands. They could tell it was put there by fingers. Another thing that gave Brendon away was how he was using his wife's computer to contact the guy. He made sure he used his wife's computer so the investigation would show it coming from her device. But they found the account posing as his wife was active when he was home and not used at all when he went out of town. Which is the opposite of what you'd expect if it were her. The au pair was sentenced to 10 years in prison. Brendon gets sentenced next month. I liked the host of this podcast. She was a good storyteller, she was appropriately angry at Brendon and his au pair during the story. I liked that she cared. I do need to take one point off for profanity as per the rules and I give this podcast 4/5.
Anything Goes with Emma Chamberlain Review
This is the 47th podcast. It is currently ranked number 46. The episode is titled, "friendship breakups and boundaries, advice session." It was released on March 26. This episode Emma Chamberlain talks about friendships breaking up. I really got the sense that she didn't know what she was talking about. I am definitely not the target audience for this. I think it is directed to single women in their 20s. As she was talking I just thought the women thinking about friendship this way are being way too dramatic. Friendship shouldn't be so serious and you don't need to have a big talk to stop being friends. People can just stop doing things with each other. Happens all the time. She responded to questions. One of the people asked her about what she should do with a friend who has sensitive information about her that she wants to stop being friends with. She went on and on on this. I don't want to get too much into this. It wasn't my cup of tea. It's possible some people might have found some advice she gave useful. I give this podcast 2/5. I would give it a 3 due to me thinking it wasn't useful advice but maybe some people would think it was useful and then minus one point for profanity.
Monday, April 6, 2026
Mr. Ballen Podcast Review
This is my 46th podcast. It is currently ranked number 40. The episode title is, "As Seen on TV." It was released on March 30. This was an interesting telling of a crime told in story mode. A guy named Patrick Isoird in France was lured to a cave by a woman who was acting romantically interested in him but was really just wanting to get him murdered by this other guy. The murder was a revenge murder becaus Patrick got involved with another guys wife and when he found out she killed herself. The case remained unsolved though both of the murderers were suspects, but they were not suspected of acting together. The case was finally solved when the woman who lured him into the cave watched Patrick's brother plead for help on TV and she felt bad. This had good storytelling of this crime and I rate this podcast 5/5.
Thursday, April 2, 2026
House Guest Review
This is my 45th podcast. This podcast is currently ranked 74. The episode was titled, "Kyla Pratt Shows Why She's Everyone's Favorite Cousin." The episode aired March 21. I didn't know who Kyla Pratt was before listening to this. She used to be a child actress. She was in Doctor Doolittle with Eddie Murphy. I never watched Doctor Doolittle movies. The one Eddie Murphy movie I really liked back in the day was Bowfinger. Highly recommend to watch Bowfinger. This is the most memorable scene for me in that movie:
She talked about how she learned how to act on set with him. She said he would be fun but when it was time to be serious, he would be serious. She says she tries to be the same way to have fun but be serious at the right times.
They talked some about a show she is in now called, "Animal Control." I wondered if I should check this show out as it has Joel McHale in it who I found funny back in the day. Kyla mentioned a Gwenyth Paltrow quote where she said, "I wish you well" after winning a lawsuit against her in a Park City skiing accident. I remember following this story because it was in Park City. I liked how Paltrow didn't just pay off the guy so she didn't have to deal with it but stood up for herself.
Overall, I thought this podcast had some interesting moments and some moments not as interesting. I give it 3/5. One point off for profanity and one point off for the not interesting moments.
Kill Tony Review
This is my 44th podcast. It is currently ranked number 36. This was the most horrendous podcast. This podcast was an alleged comedy show in front of an audience. It was crude and not funny at all. "Comedians" would have sixty seconds to tell their unfunny jokes and then it would be followed by an unfunny interview with the unfunny hosts. The audience would have to be drunk to find this entertaining. It reminded me of the Army experiencing how unfunny drunk people are as they tell each other their unfunny jokes. 0/5.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)